Publications

EBSA Adds Self-Correction Component to Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program Update

On January 15, 2025, the Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) published a final rule updating its Voluntary Fiduciary Correction (VFC) Program (the “Updated VFC Program”), based on proposed rules issued in November of 2022. The Updated VFC Program will take effect on March 17, 2025. The most significant changes to the VFC under the Updated VFC Program are the addition of two new self-correction features for common plan failures: Other changes under the revised program include (i) alternative corrections for prohibited transactions involving certain plan loans made at below-market interest rates, (ii) corrections for purchase and sale transactions involving the plan and parties in interest, and certain clarifying changes. This article focuses on the new self-correction opportunities. VFC Application Process.  Under the prior version of VFC (effective through March 16, 2025), plan fiduciaries were permitted to correct certain fiduciary breach violations and prohibited transactions under the Employee Retirement Income Security

Read More »

Lewandowski v. Johnson & Johnson—Unable in First Try to Pursue Fiduciary Breach Claims for High Costs of Drugs

The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey dismissed without prejudice, and with leave to amend, Ann Lewandowski’s breach of fiduciary duty claims against Johnson & Johnson and its Pension & Benefits Committee (the “Health Plan Fiduciaries”), stating that she lacked Article III standing.  (Lewandowski v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., D.N.J., No 3:24-cv-00671) (The “J&J Case”).  The focus of the lawsuit was the allegation that the Health Plan Fiduciaries  entered into an agreement with the pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) for the health plans that required the health plans and the participants to overpay for the costs of prescription drugs. The Complaint in the J&J Case.  The First Amended Complaint alleged the following breaches of fiduciary duties by the Health Plan Fiduciaries: The allegations are based on the ERISA requirement that fiduciaries must “discharge [their] duties with respect to a plan solely in the interest of the participants

Read More »

New ACA Penalty and Reporting Relief 

As a special holiday treat last December, two bills were signed into law: the Paperwork Burden Reduction Act and the Employer Reporting Improvement Act.  These new laws will help ease the burden of Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) reporting and give employers more time to respond to proposed penalty assessments under the Internal Revenue Code Section 4980H Employer Shared Responsibility rules. Alternative method allowed for distributing Forms 1095-C to full-time employees.  Employers with 50 or more full-time employees (including full-time equivalents) in the prior year (“ALEs”) are required to file Forms 1095-C with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and distribute these same forms to their full-time employees.  These forms provide information on the medical plan coverage that was offered to the employee.  Under the Paperwork Burden Reduction Act provisions, ALEs are no longer required to automatically mail Forms 1095-C to employees.  Instead, an ALE may provide a “clear, conspicuous, and accessible”

Read More »

Update on the Status of the 2024 Retirement Security Rule: What is Old is New Again

If all had gone according to the Department of Labor’s (the “DOL’s”) plan, the final Retirement Security Rule issued on April 25, 2024[1] (2024 Fiduciary Rule) would currently be the law of the land, replacing the near fifty-year-old regulatory test (the “1975 Regulation”) defining an investment advice fiduciary. However, on two consecutive days this past summer, July 25 and 26, 2024, district courts in the Eastern District (Consumer Choice[2]) and Northern District (American Council[3]) of Texas granted plaintiffs’ motions to stay the 2024 Fiduciary Rule’s September23, 2024, effective date, which ostensibly stopped application of the rule and its accompanying regulatory package in its tracks.[4] These two cases are far from novel, resembling the 2018 Chamber case which ultimately led to the demise (vacatur) of the 2016 Fiduciary Rule regulatory package.[5] Brushing up against the 60-day window to appeal, on September 20 and 21st, 2024, the DOL filed notices of appeal

Read More »

What Plan Sponsors Need to Know About the Final Rule under the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act

The final regulations amending the existing Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (“MHPAEA”) regulations were released in September of this year by the Departments of Labor (“DOL”), Treasury, and Health and Human Services (collectively the “Departments”) (the “Final Rule”).  The chief focus of the Final Rule is ensuring parity in access to mental health/substance use benefits as compared with medical/surgical benefits.  The Departments make it clear they believe that despite MHPAEA being in effect since 2008, disparities between coverage of mental health /substance use disorder benefits and medical/surgical benefits are actually getting worse. For example, the preamble to the Final Rule cites a study by RTI International which found that out-of-network use was 3.5 times higher for all behavioral health clinician office visits compared to medical/surgical office visits and that this was not fully attributable to behavioral health provider shortages.  The preamble notes that the RTI study also revealed

Read More »

Retirement Plan Forfeitures: A New Wave of Class Action ERISA Litigation

Over the past year, a flurry of class action lawsuits alleging misuse of retirement plan forfeitures have been filed against major U.S. retirement plans and their fiduciaries.  Starting in September 2023, a plaintiff’s law firm filed a putative class action lawsuit against Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., in the Southern District of California, which alleged that Thermo Fisher retirement plan fiduciaries breached their duties, violated ERISA’s anti-inurement provision and engaged in prohibited transactions by using plan forfeitures to offset employer matching contribution obligations instead of paying down plan administrative costs otherwise payable by plan participants.  Although using forfeitures to offset employer contributions has been expressly allowed under U.S. Treasury rules for decades, the plaintiffs in Thermo Fisher asserted the novel theory that doing so violated ERISA’s fiduciary duties of loyalty and prudence.  Since that time, approximately 15 similar lawsuits have been filed by several plaintiffs’ law firms across the country against

Read More »
  • Search

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Practice Areas

  • Office Locations

    SAN FRANCISCO


    135 Main Street, 9th Floor

    San Francisco, CA 94105-1815

    LOS ANGELES


    15760 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 910

    Los Angeles, CA 91436-2964

    PORTLAND

    329 NE Couch Street, Suite 200

    Portland, OR 97232-1332

    Awards & Recognition